A BRIEF HISTORY OF THE OWNERSHIP OF
KIRCHNER'S BERLIN STREET SCENE
1913-14 Ernst Ludwig Kirchner painted Berlin Street Scene in his
apartment-turned-studio at Körnerstrasse 45, in Berlin's Friedenau district. Sometime
before selling it he photographed the front and back of the canvas. The latter
bears a landscape scene.
1918-23 In 1918, Alfred Hess (1879-1931), a Jewish businessman and co-proprietor
of M. & L. Hess Schuhfabrik A. G., a shoe factory in Erfurt, began assembling what was to
become one of the most important collections of German Expressionist art.
Hess was initially advised by Edwin Redslob (1884-1973),
director of the Städtisches Museum in Erfurt (today the Angermuseum) from 1912 -1919.
He started to collect Kirchner paintings by 1918 with the aim of giving them to
the museum along with other works from his growing collection. In 1920, the art
historian Walter Kaesbach (1879-1961) became the new director of the museum. He
soon developed a close friendship with Hess that would result in the
collector's continued financial support and loans to the museum. Nevertheless,
Hess's name was never mentioned in the museum's annual reports. This was due to
the strong antisemitism in and around Erfurt. Long before the National Socialists
came to power, nationalistic groups in this area of Germany already started to harass Jews,
especially collectors such as Hess, and
disparaged modern works of art.
Although it is not known precisely when Hess acquired Berlin
Street Scene, it is likely that he did so sometime between 1918 and 1921,
possibly directly from the artist.
In 1923, the art historian Walter Passarge (1898-1958) made
the first written reference to Berlin Street Scene in the art magazine
Cicerone. In his article “Junge Kunst in Erfurt" - a report about modern art
in museums and private collections in Erfurt - he wrote, "Kirchner [is
represented in Erfurt] by numerous characteristic works,
including a street scene filled with crowded life." He did not, however,
name the owner of this "Street Scene" painting.
Hess exhibited the painting in a room devoted to Kirchner's
work within his spacious Erfurt villa at Richard-Breslau-Strasse
14, designed by the architect Paul Schultze-Naumburg and constructed between
1910 and 1912. Thanks to the generous hospitality of the collector and his
wife, Tekla, née Pauson (1884- 1968), the villa was a meeting point for
artists, writers, and musicians in the 1920s.
1924 In the summer of 1924 an illustration of Berlin Street Scene appeared
in the catalogue for an exhibition at the Neue Staatsgalerie in Munich entitled
“Deutsche Malerei in den letzten fünfzig Jahren: Ausstellung von Meisterwerken aus öffentlichem und privatem
Besitz”, organized by the Bayerische Staatsgemäldesammlungen. The painting was
listed as no. 93 bearing the title “Street Scene” (Strassenszene) and belonging
to "Herr Alfred Hess, Erfurt”.
1930-31 As a consequence of the world economic crisis the M. & L, Hess
Schuhfabrik entered a period of financial difficulties in 1930 which lasted
until 1933.
On December 24, 1931, Alfred Hess died unexpectedly in Jena, at the age of 52. A number of art
magazines and newspapers published obituaries about the respected art
collector. One obituary read: “Alfred Hess was the kind of collector that
German art needs more than ever nowadays, if it is to survive these dreadful
times without damage. He did not only collect pleasing French art but also
demure German art: this not only out of personal preference but overall out of
a certain sense of responsibility for the future of German culture”. Alfred
Hess left behind a collection of some 80 paintings, 220 watercolors and
drawings, and 4,000 graphic works. Tekla Hess waived her right to this
inheritance. As a result it became the property of their son, Hans Hess
(1908-1975). Hans transferred administration of the collection to his mother,
in trust, until at least 1939. On January 14, 1931, he moved to Berlin-Charlottenburg.
1932 Hans Hess sold his parents' Erfurt villa to his uncle Georg Hess in
mid-September. Tekla Hess, some six months earlier, had already moved to Lichtenfels, Bavaria, the town where she was born, to
live with her mother and two brothers. The increasing hostility agains Jews in Erfurt caused this move.
Tekla Hess tried to find a suitable home for the collection.
She contacted the Anger Museum and the Kunstmuseum in Basel. Knowing that she did not have any
appropriate storage space for the collection and conscious of the growing
threats against expressionist art promoted by the Nazi party, she wanted the
collection to go to a major museum which would be able to safeguard it
appropriately. Except for a few occasional sales, the art collection consisting
of 4,000 items, remained intact until January
30, 1933.
1933 By May 1933, the Hess Schuhfabrik was able to pay off its debts and
avoid insolvency. From then on the
company recovered from its financial problems.
In June, Hans Hess was fired from his position at the Berlin publishing house Ullstein Verlag,
where he had been employed in a well-paid position since October 1932. His
dismissal was for "racial reasons”. In 1967 he applied for and received
some compensation from the German Government for the loss of his income due to
Nazi persecution. After his apartment was raided by the Nazis and threats were
made that they would soon return, he fled to Paris in June 1933 and emigrated to London in 1935 .
The “Kampfbund für Deutsche Kultur” [association fighting
for German culture], led by the Nazi chief ideologist Alfred Rosenberg, swept
through German cities and in defamation campaigns slandered expressionist
artists and their artworks. Representatives of modern art were depicted as
“anti-national cultural Bolsheviks” and promoters of world revolution who had
to be attacked with all means at hand. The Hess art collection was despised in
Nazi Germany as degenerate art. Hans Hess could no longer help his mother in
securing and maintaining the artworks because he had already fled to Paris.
Sometime before mid-September, Tekla Hess decided to
temporarily send nearly a hundred artworks from Germany to Switzerland, among them sixty paintings from
her collection.
The paintings were shown in October 1933 at the Kunsthalle
Basel at a show entitled “Modern German Paintings from Private Collections”.The
exhibition made it possible to declare the shipment of the Hess paintings to Basel from Nazi Germany as a loan
therefore avoiding the allegation that it was an illegal permanent transfer of
assets into a foreign country. Otherwise, the transaction would have been
subject to severe penalties based on German tax and foreign exchange offenses.
Because Jews were forced to flee Germany due to the racial laws and other
oppressive measures, their property was under close scrutiny from the GESTAPO
and “illegal” property transfers could subject them to both economic penalties
and prison. Jews were threatened in particular because any transfer of movable
assets into a foreign country was subject to intense controls. Since the Nazis
seized power, tax and foreign exchange laws were used as a means of repression
against them. For this reason it was of highest importance that the artworks in
the Hess collection were to be declared as loans for exhibition purposes so
that they could be shipped freely to Basel and not be subjected to export
duties. However, when the collection was not returned to Germany, the authorities began to ask
questions as to when it would be returned.
Berlin Street Scene was shown at the Kunsthalle Basel from
October 7 to October 29, 1933. The painting was listed in the
exhibition catalogue under the title “Street in Paris” (Strasse in Paris), 1913, as number 60.
On October 19, 1933, a review of the show, with an
illustration of Berlin Street Scene, appeared in Basel's newspaper, the Nationalzeitung.
Written by the Basel art historian Georg Schmidt (1896-1965), it read in
part:
"Kirchner's strongest painting in the exhibition is
surely the street scene, in which the silhouettes of people, cars, and houses
are endlessly layered over one another .... It is ... the big city around the
year 1910, whose crisis is anticipated in such paintings."
In a letter dated October 24, 1933, the museum answered the inquiry of
a private collector, who wanted to buy paintings from the Hess collection,
telling him that they were not for sale.
In November 1933, the M. & L. Hess Schuhfabrik A.G. was
converted into Hess Schuhfabrik A. G. and henceforth run by an “Aryan”
director.
1934 Tekla and Hans Hess continued to live from hand to mouth. To subsist it
became inevitable to divest artworks. In keeping with their decision to keep
the collection together, mother and son first tried to sell to a significant
museum in Erfurt with whom the collection had a long association.
On June 1, 1934, at the request of Tekla Hess, the
Kunsthalle Basel sent fifty-eight paintings, one reverse-glass painting, and a
tapestry, as well as thirty-four watercolors, pastels, drawings, and woodcuts,
to the Kunsthaus Zurich. The shipment included Kirchner's Berlin Street Scene-identified
as Street in Paris (Big City Street) on the shipping list.
Wilhelm Wartmann organized the exhibition “Neue deutsche
Malerei” at the Kunsthaus Zurich (June 21 - July 15). Works from the Hess
collection comprised the core of the exhibition. Berlin Street Scene was listed
in the catalogue under entry number 71 as Big City Street, Paris.
Only two works from the Hess collection were sold: a
watercolor by Karl Schmidt-Rottluff and a watercolor by Christian Rohlfs, each
for 350 Swiss francs.
Some time in late September or early October, Walter Klug
(1873-1952), business manager and director of the Kölnische Kunstverein since
1914, contacted Kirchner, who was living in Davos, Switzerland, to ask him if he would send some
of his paintings to sell.
Kirchner declined, writing: "I received your card. As
you know, due to present-day exchange regulations, it is totally impossible to
sell something over there [in Germany]. I therefore cannot give you any
works to sell on commission. Plenty of my works, however, are floating around
in the art trade from the collections of people who have fled or been forced to
emigrate”.
1935 On February 4, 1935, Tekla Hess asked the Kunsthaus
Zurich to send three oil paintings, two by Emil Nolde and one by Oskar Kokoschka,
to the Kölnische Kunstverein in Cologne for a Nolde exhibition that had
opened there early in January.
In March 1935, Hans Hess, Adolf Hess and Georg Hess had to
sell a parcel of land for a price far under market value. After a claim was
filed for its return, the German restitution office decided that the property
was lost due to Nazi persecution and returned it to them in 1997.
On August 31, 1935, Tekla Hess instructed the
Kunsthaus Zurich to send several paintings to Erfurt, among them two by Kirchner. These
were listed on the shipping order as “The Trapeze” (Das Trapez), insured for
900 reichsmarks, and “House on Fehmarn” (Haus auf Fehmarn), insured for 1200
reichsmarks.
On September 15, 1935 the German parliament enacted the Nuremberg racial laws which severely restricted both the economic and civil rights
of Jews in Germany. This set the stage for the
plundering of Jewish property and forced many Jewish families to flee Germany. In addition, Jews were also forced
to pay prohibitve exit taxes and Jewish taxes which effectively stripped them
of their property.
1936-39 In mid-August 1936, Tekla Hess wrote again to the Kunsthaus Zurich:
"May I trouble you to send my Marc paintings that are stored with you ...
to the Köln Kunsthalle as freight goods for the large 'Marc-Memorial'
exhibition, scheduled to open there in early September .... Please send as well
4-5 Kirchner paintings - Friedrichstrasse, Potsdamerplatz [actually Berlin
Street Scene], Bucht [Bay], Hängematte [Hammock] , and perhaps the small Kirchner
oil painting, Frauen im Walde [Women in the Forest].... Cologne will carry all the costs ... as
long as crates of mine are still there. The Kunstverein is very happy to be
able to borrow these beautiful works for [the exhibition], which I very reluctantly
approved because transport always results in damage."
Later, in a 1958
affidavit, Tekla Hess stated her reasons for instructing that the works
be sent from Zurich to Cologne: "In 1936, during the late evening hours,
two agents of the secret police [GESTAPO] from Nuremberg coerced me under
threat to have the pictures in the Hess collection which were kept at the time
at 'Kunsthaus Zurich' returned to Germany immediately. Even though I fully understood
that this threat could result in the complete loss of the entire collection, I
had no choice other than to give in to the pressure being exerted by this all-powerful
agency of the [Nazi] government, in the hope that my own life and that of my
family would not be further jeopardized."
The “loan” of the Hess collection to Switzerland was thus called back by Nazi
authorities who threatened dire consequences if the collection was not
returned.
By the spring of 1939, Tekla Hess had left her home in
Lichtenfels to emigrate to London, writing to Wilhelm Wartmann on
April 4: "I've been in London for a few days .... I couldn't
leave Germany sooner."
In September 1936, the Marc Retrospective was ultimately
forbidden by the Nazis. Waler Klug, who had received the paintings from Tekla
Hess, took some into safekeeping, most notably the four Kirchner paintings. He
then offered them for sale, presumably on commission.
At the end of September 1936, the economic consultant to the
NSDAP ordered that all the shares of the Hess Schuhfabrik and its successor
companies that were still owned by Jewish shareholders be aryanized
(transferred into non-jewish ownership). In a decision issued in 2002, after
claims for restitution were filed, the administrative court found the shares to
have been lost due to Nazi persecution.
In the fall of 1936, Carl Hagemann (1867-1940), a retired
chemist and the former manager of IG Farben, then living in Frankfurt am Main -
a longtime friend of Kirchner and one of the most important collectors of his
work - informed Kirchner that several of Kirchner’s paintings had been offered
to him.
In a letter dated October 31, 1936, Kirchner wrote to him: “The Street
Scene must be the one that is exhibited here in Zurich with red and blue, not green. I
think these paintings belong to Jewish people that must leave.”
Late in 1936 or early in 1937, Hagemann decided to acquire
Berlin Street Scene. The sale to Hagemann caused a stir among collectors and
museum officials as they realized the Hess collection was under pressure and
this afforded them an opportunity to add to their collections. When a list of
paintings from the Hess collection made the round amongst German art
collectors, Hagemann’s art consultant Ernst Gosebruch wrote to Hagemann,” I
thought immediately of the Hess collection in Erfurt where your wonderful Street Scene
by Kirchner came from. I called Heckel since a number of his paintings and
watercolors are on the list. He indicated immediately that they had to be the
remains of the Hess collection. Recently I learned from Schmitt-Rottluff that
Mrs. Hess was intent on emigrating [...] at this point in time any collection
of modern art which is to be sold quickly is likely to be a Jewish collection
whose owner is forced to take up his walking stick.”
Earlier
Hagemann had intended to donate his entire collection - at the very least his
graphic work - to the Folkwang Museum in Essen, whose director, Ernst Gosebruch
(1872-1953), was a close friend. The repressive cultural politics of the
National Socialists, however, caused him to change his plans. Put under
pressure by the Nazis, Gosebruch resigned his post in the fall of 1933. By the
end of 1937, a year in which thousands of modern artworks were confiscated from
German museums and in which many of them were exhibited in the defamatory
“Entartete Kunst” (degenerate art) exhibition that opened in Munich in June, Hagemann, a bachelor,
designated his siblings as heirs. Thereafter, Hagemann came into closer contact
with Ernst Holzinger (1901-1972), who in 1938 became the director of the
Städelsches Kunstinstitut in Frankfurt.
On November
11, 1938,
the night of the Kristallnacht, the SA
shattered the storefronts of about 7500 Jewish stores and businesses, leaving
the streets covered in smashed windows the next morning.
1940-48 Hagemann died on November
20, 1940,
run over by a streetcar in front of the Frankfurt train station. His collection of 90
paintings, 220 watercolors, 30 sculptures, and some 1,500 drawings and graphic
works by important Expressionist artists went to Otto Hagemann (1869-1947) in
Essen and Fritz Hagemann (1871-1963) in Hamm (Westphalia), as well as to Maria
Helsig, nee Hagemann (1875- 1962), in Kiel. They remained joint heirs until
1948.
Holzinger,
like other cultural officials who remained in official posts in Nazi Germany
joined the Nazi party. Between 1941 and 1945, he served as an expert adviser
for the district of Hessen-Nassau to the committee on "Sicherung und
Verwertung von Kulturgut aus jüdischem Besitz für Zwecke des Reiches"
(Securing and financially exploiting cultural goods owned by Jews for the
purpose of the Reich). In this position, Holzinger examined Jewish art
collections to determine what artworks should be confiscated as nationally
valuable. These artworks were then confiscated and deposited with German
museums as a condition for permitting their Jewish owners exit permits.
Due to the
increasing bombing raids Holzinger was able to persuade the Hagemann heirs to
store the Hagemann collection in a more secure place. On April
28, 1941,
the collection was deposited for safekeeping in the Städelsches Kunstinstitut.
Among the paintings was “Berlin Street Scene”. During the course of the war,
the Hagemann collection and the Städel's own holdings were evacuated from the
museum and kept in various locations. Stored outside of Frankfurt, the paintings in the Hagemann
collection survived the war, Carl Hagemann's house was completely destroyed by
bombs.
At the end
of World War II, many of the artworks in the Hagemann collection were brought
to the Central Collecting Point in Wiesbaden, where American Allied troops
guarded stolen and evacuated art until its ownership could be resolved to some
degree. In 1947, the Hagemann collection was returned to the Städelsches
Kunstinstitut.
Although
Hagemann's heirs had wished to keep the collection together, because of
material hardships suffered in the wake of the war, they divided the collection
among themselves in late summer of 1948.
From
September 26 to November 30, 1948, major artworks from the Hagemann
collection were exhibited in “Expressionisten: Sammlung Hagemann” at the
Städelsches Kunstinstitut. In accordance with a suggestion in their deceased
brother's will, Else Hagemann (the widow of Otto Hagemann, who had died in
1947), Fritz Hagemann, and Maria Helsig decided to donate to the Städelsches
Kunstinstitut all the prints and drawings they had inherited. Hagemann's heirs
also decided to give Holzinger an artwork of his choice from their inheritance.
Holzinger selected Kirchner's “Berlin Street Scene.”
“Berlin
Street Scene” thus ended up in the hands of Holzinger, a Nazi official, who had
spent a good amount of his time in the Nazi period assisting in selecting and
confiscating artworks from Jewish collections.
1949-72 Holzinger lent Kirchner's “Berlin
Street Scene” to the Städelsches Kunstinstitut, where it remained on loan from
a "private collection" until his death in 1972.
As the
museum's director until 1972, Holzinger granted loan requests from numerous
European and American museums wishing to show the painting. However, these
loans were anonymous and Holzinger was never listed as the owner.
1958 On March 25, Hans Hess filed for
restitution of the artworks from the Hess collection with the German
government. However, he was unable to specify specific artworks in the claim as
he did not know the whereabouts of the artworks and a restitution award under
the then applicable German restitution law was dependent on a showing that the
lost assets were seized by the German government on German territory. Unable to
prove these requirements, Hans Hess had to withdraw his restitution claim in
order to be eligible for compensation. Under the compensation law, Hans Hess
received compensation for the loss of the art collection as it was determined
to be a loss due to Nazi persecution. However, the maximum amount was 75,000
marks for the entire collection which was only a symbolic compensation. Hans
Hess continued to look for the artworks that were once in his parents
collection. After Hans Hess died in January 1975, his daughter, Anita Halpin
continued the quest.
1973-80 Elisabeth Holzinger, Ernst
Holzinger's widow, extended the loan of Berlin Street Scene to the Städelsches
Kunstinstitut until 1980. In 1980, Leopold Reidemeister (1900-1987), founding
director of the Brücke-Museum in Berlin and a friend of Holzinger's since their
college days, negotiated the sale of Berlin Street Scene to the Federal State
of Berlin.
No inquiry
was made as to how Hagemann obtained the painting from the Hess family or as to
how Holzinger, a Nazi official, obtained its possession.
The City of
Berlin covered the cost of the painting
with funds from the Museum Fund of the Senator for Cultural Affairs and
transferred the painting to the Brücke-Museum in Berlin.
1980-2006
The Brücke-Museum
lent Berlin Street Scene to numerous institutions for exhibitions throughout Europe and the United States, but did not disclose its
provenance.
2004-06 On October 4,
2004,
attorneys David J. Rowland, of Rowland & Associates in New York and Peter Schink of Schink & Studzinski
in Berlin, requested the return of Kirchner's
“Berlin Street Scene” from the Brücke-Museum in Berlin. Their claim was made on behalf of
Anita Halpin, daughter of Hans Hess. The restitution claim was based on the
fact that the sale took place at the end of 1936 or the beginning of 1937,
after the Nuremberg racial laws came into effect, and that it was a forced sale
due to Nazi persecution. According to German restitution law and policy
concerning the restitution of property lost due to Nazi persecution, the
Federal State of Berlin could only have rebutted the presumption of a forced
sale due to Nazi persecution by showing that Tekla Hess received an appropriate
purchase price and that Tekla Hess had access to the proceeds of the sale, and
that Hans and Tekla Hess would have sold the painting in absence of the Nazi
regime or that the buyer, at the time of the sale, specifically protected the
pecuniary interests of Tekla and Hans Hess. The Senate Department for Science,
Research, and Culture in Berlin, responsible for property of the
Federal State of Berlin, handled the restitution claim. They hired attorneys
who reviewed the matter and issued an expert opinion which stated that the painting was lost in a
forced sale due to Nazi persecution. During nearly two years of negotiations,
the possibility of retaining the painting in Berlin in return for financial
compensation to Anita Halpin was discussed but no agreement was reached.
At the
time, the city of Berlin had financial difficulties and was
not able to pay fair compensation for the painting. Therefore, despite the
goodwill of both parties, negotiations to keep the painting in Berlin failed.
On August
1, 2006,
the Berlin Senat returned Kirchner's Berlin Street Scene to Anita Halpin. The
Senat decided in favor of the return of the painting because the sale took
place after the Nuremberg racial laws went into effect and
the Hess family was persecuted by the Nazis and was forced to flee Germany. In addition, the presumption of a
forced sale due to persecution could not be disproven by showing that the
seller of the painting, Tekla Hess, "had received an appropriate sales
price" in the winter of 1936-37 or "that the transaction, in its
essential form, would ever have been carried out, if the National Socialists
had not been in power”. In return for the painting, Anita Halpin paid back to
the City of Berlin the 1980 purchase price (approximately one million Euro) paid by the City of Berlin to the Holzinger
family.
On
Wednesday evening, November 8, 2006, the Neue Galerie New York and a private
collector purchaed Kirchner's Berlin Street Scene, paying the highest price to
date for a work by the artist.
In the
summer of 2007 the Neue Galerie exhibited the painting to rave reviews and
thousands of visitors. A German newspaper reported that “Berlin Street Scene”
was right at home in New York.